Methodological Rigor
Every project begins with a definitive research plan: the question we answer, the sources we exhaust, and the standard the conclusion must meet.
In matters of intellectual property, the difference between a thorough search and a defensible conclusion is not technology — it is judgment. 3AIP brings rigorous methodology applied by experts who understand what the findings mean, not just how to find them.
Prior art, FTO, invalidity or landscape research built around the decision it must support.
Send us your AI tool’s results. We assess what is reliable, what is weak and what is missing.
Documented reasoning trail, full source traceability and a named analyst who stands behind the work.
Patent data is plentiful; retrieval tools have made it more so. What remains scarce is the layer in between — reading evidence against the specific question, deciding what is genuinely relevant, and building a record the decision can rest on.
Every project begins with a definitive research plan: the question we answer, the sources we exhaust, and the standard the conclusion must meet.
Reports built for use, not for filing: every conclusion documented, every source traceable, every finding standing behind a named analyst.
Our analysts deliver judgment, not raw findings: what was found, what it means for your question, and what to do about it.
Coverage across major patent jurisdictions, with research plans aligned to the relevant offices, family records and technical sources. Every project is handled by a named analyst and reviewer.
Every search begins and ends with a person. Our analyst reads your invention, builds the search strategy — concepts, classification codes, terminology and technical equivalents — and runs it across patent databases and non-patent literature, refining the queries as the art comes in.
AI sits at the edges of that work, not at its center. We use it for routine tasks that slow analysts down without changing the conclusion — removing duplicates, grouping patent families, translating foreign-language documents and formatting reports — so more of the analyst’s time goes into reading and judging the art.
Your confidential material is never entered into any third-party AI tool.
Which references matter, why they matter and what they mean for your claims are decisions made and signed by a named analyst. The tools save time; the search, the judgment and the confidentiality stay with people.
Novelty and non-obviousness research across patent and non-patent literature, including standards, academic publications and difficult-to-index sources.
Jurisdiction-specific clearance analysis focused on live claims, prosecution history and practical design-around options.
Litigation-ready research and evidence-of-use analysis supported by claim-level mapping and traceable source documentation.
Structured portfolio intelligence that clarifies crowded fields, emerging activity, competitor positions and open technical territory.
Clear, citation-led claim mapping for licensing, assertion, diligence, prosecution and portfolio review.
Formal patent drawings prepared for filing requirements across major jurisdictions and coordinated with prosecution teams.
Send us the output from your AI tool. We independently assess what is reliable, what is weak and what is missing. If you proceed with a comprehensive manual search on the same matter, your validation fee is credited in full against its cost.
Finding the art is only the beginning. Human review, documented reasoning and named sign-off turn findings into a record counsel can use.
A named analyst reads the invention and builds the search strategy: concepts, CPC/IPC classifications, keywords and technical equivalents. The analyst then runs and refines the search across patent databases and non-patent literature. AI tools help with routine tasks such as de-duplication, family grouping and translation; they do not decide what is searched or what is relevant. The client’s confidential disclosure is never submitted to any third-party AI tool.
A named analyst assesses every retrieved reference against the question the research must answer. Where the engagement is claim-focused — such as FTO, evidence-of-use or infringement analysis — the analyst maps the relevant claim elements against the technology or evidence under review. Hallucinated, unsupported or misapplied citations are flagged in every service.
Full audit trail: search queries run, databases accessed, relevance rationale for every included and excluded reference. Reproducible and defensible.
A credentialed analyst and senior reviewer co-sign every deliverable. The opinion is ours, not the algorithm’s. Every methodology decision is documented and reproducible.
Client identities withheld
“We believe we can challenge the patent’s novelty using the identified prior art. Good start!”
“Phenomenal work, as always.”
“It seems your searchers are on the right track!”
“The analytics linked to historical events made the entire dataset genuinely useful.”
Unedited client feedback. Identities withheld by segment and region.
“Regarding that search: the results were impeccable.”
“As said, I am quite happy with the new format, as it makes cross-checking and commenting quite easy.”
“Your results have been very helpful in assessing our options in the planned opposition proceedings. The documents you identified are relevant in the field.”
“The Korean document is a perfect disclosure – it makes clear this should break before the part is damaged.”
“That looks fantastic. The first prior-art document is a perfect hit – and the second is really good too.”
“The report looks good. We used the references you identified in submitting the third-party submission.”
“The Examiner has accepted the first application. Thank you for your excellent work.”
“Terrific work on these materials. I look forward to working together on further applications.”
“Thanks for the fast turnaround on the project.”
For teams with recurring search needs.
Beyond individual projects, 3AIP works as an ongoing extension of in-house IP teams and firms — dedicated, credentialed analysts who learn your portfolio and core technology areas, coordinate directly with your attorneys, and work across a time-zone offset so searches progress overnight and results are ready when your day begins. For pre-filing, M&A and venture-diligence matters, confidential material is handled in controlled environments under NDA and is never exposed to third-party AI tools. Our analysts do the searching, and your material stays inside our controlled environment.
Request a representative sample matched to the service and technical context you are evaluating.
Prior-art ranking, novelty assessment and claim-focused analyst opinion.
Request sampleLive-claim review, jurisdiction risk matrix and design-around observations.
Request samplePriority-date evidence, element mapping and documented invalidity rationale.
Request sampleProduct evidence mapped to claim elements with traceable supporting sources.
Request samplePortfolio segmentation, filing trends, competitor positions and open territory.
Request sampleUse-ready claim mapping for licensing review and target prioritisation.
Request sampleA coordinated drawing set prepared around formal filing requirements.
Request sampleExaminer-citation review, supplemental research and prosecution support analysis.
Request sampleIndependent assessment of client-supplied AI results: what is reliable, what is weak and what is missing.
Request sampleConfidentiality built for pre-filing, M&A and sensitive diligence matters: NDA-first, isolated data environments, full audit trail.
See our security standardsA 20-minute scoping call with the analyst who would run your search.